英雄
砥砺奋进普法路 法治沃土育新篇_我的网站

一 | 今年以来,市司法局作为统筹推进法治建设的主责机关,在普法与依法治理工作中持续用力、奋发前行,抚顺市公民法治素养得到显著提升。如今,我市燃起了全民尊法、学法、守法、用法的新热潮,展现出法治建设的新风貌。 CANBERRA, Australia -- Opposing campaigners made their final pitches on Friday over changing the Australia's constitution to acknowledge a place for Indigenous Australians on the eve of the nation's first referendum in a generation.The referendum has the potential to amend Australia’s founding legal document for the first time since 1977. But opinion polls suggest that the amendment will be rejected as more than four-in-five referendums have been in the past.Australians are being asked to alter the constitution to recognize the “First Peoples of Australia” by establishing an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.The committee comprised of and chosen by Indigenous Australians would advise the Parliament and government on issues that affect the nation’s most disadvantaged ethnic minority.Indigenous Australians account for only 3.8% of Australia’s population. But they die on average eight years younger than the wider population, have a suicide rate twice that of the national average and suffer from diseases in the remote Outback that have been eradicated from other wealthy countries.Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, a leading Voice advocate, cited the Israel-Hamas war to underscore why Australians should vote “yes” out of kindness toward the Indigenous population.“This week of all weeks where we see such trauma in the world, there is nothing — no cost — to Australians showing kindness, thinking with their heart as well as their head, when they enter the polling booth tomorrow and vote ‘yes,’” Albanese said.“Kindness costs nothing. Thinking of others costs nothing. This is a time where Australians have that opportunity to show the generosity of spirit that I see in the Australian character where at the worst of times we always see the best of the Australian character,” Albanese added.Opposition leader Peter Dutton, whose conservative party opposes the Voice, said polling showing declining support for the referendum over the past year was evidence Albanese failed to convince voters of the benefits of the Voice. “He’s instinctively won their hearts because Australians do want better outcomes for Indigenous Australians, but he hasn’t won their minds,” Dutton told Australian Broadcasting Corp.Indigenous activist Robbie Thorpe drew attention to Indigenous division over the Voice this week by applying for a High Court injunction to stop the referendum. “The referendum is an attack on Aboriginal Sovereignty,” Thorpe said in a statement on Friday.But the High Court said his writ had been rejected on Thursday on the grounds that it appeared to be an abuse of the court process, frivolous, vexatious or outside the court’s jurisdiction.Thorpe is among so-called progressive “no” campaigners who argue an Indigenous committee with no power of veto over legislation is not a sufficiently radical change.Many progressives argue the constitution should more importantly acknowledge that Indigenous Australians never ceded their land to British colonizers and a treaty was a higher priority than a Voice.Conservative “no” campaigners argue the Voice is too radical and the courts could interpret its powers in unpredictable ways.Some Indigenous people don’t have faith that the Voice’s membership would represent their diverse priorities.“Yes” campaigner Kyam Maher, an Indigenous man who is South Australia state’s attorney general, said the question he was most often asked by thousands of voters was what result Indigenous Australians wanted.“I can say absolutely and overwhelmingly Aboriginal people want their fellow Australians to vote ‘yes’ tomorrow,” Maher said.An opinion poll published this week supported Maher's view that a majority of Indigenous Australians wanted the Voice although that support had eroded since early 2023.Polling suggests the referendum will lose despite Australia’s peak legal, business, faith and sporting groups overwhelmingly supporting the Voice.Anne Twomey, a Sydney University constitutional law expert and a member of the Constitutional Expert Group that advised the government on drafting the referendum question, said she feared that Australian lawmakers might give up trying to change the constitution if the referendum fails.“I think it is a big concern if we end up with a constitution that’s frozen in time that we can’t change,” Twomey said.“In practice around the world, when a constitution becomes frozen and out of date with the world that it operates in, it becomes brittle and when there’s ever any stress on it, it does tend to break,” she added.___Follow AP's Asia-Pacific coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/asia-pacific。 市司法局以“头雁效应”引领普法宣传工作,强化普法责任制落实,明确各级机关普法责任分工。通过开展抚顺市国家机关“谁执法谁普法”2024年度履职报告评议会,让普法工作更具实效性。党员干部群众学法用法制度不断深化,学法清单内容与时俱进,推动各行业学法用法常态化,普法工作在管理服务中实现深度融合,推动宪法精神和法治思想深入人心。

二 | 抚顺市司法局普法与依法治理科科长崔龙说:“市司法局以多元化创新工作为推手,全力推动媒体融合普法持续发力,不断优化《律师讲法》《普法小讲堂》等传统普法平台,新开辟的《抚小司说法》等原创短视频普法内容不断推陈出新,以更生动、更贴近群众的方式传播法律知识,形成品牌化普法宣传效应。” 近年来,全市法治文化阵地建设稳步推进,新屯法润万家主题广场等成为市民学法休闲的好去处,古田社区广场、南杂木广场将阵地建设向最基层延伸,营造出浓厚的法治氛围。依托 “三缘”“三情”优势,持续加强“法律明白人”培育,组织各类能力培训,提升其法治素养与业务水平。

三 | 目前全市有4300余名“法律明白人”活跃在基层治理一线,成为法治宣传与矛盾纠纷化解的重要力量,为法治抚顺建设提供坚实保障。 抚顺市司法局普法与依法治理科科长崔龙说:“年终岁末,全市普法与依法治理工作在市法治建设委员会的坚强领导下、在市司法局党组的直接带领下,将以更加饱满的热情,更加昂扬的斗志,驰而不息投身全面振兴新突破的新征程,为建设更高水平的平安抚顺、法治抚顺贡献力量。” 责任编辑:李丹。

四 |
Current article:http://pobianbenmailuntiraoeng.cfd/news/20260826_350040.html
Published on:19:05:17


















